Return to Normal View

DOE Homepage Students Educators Community Family Administrators and Staff MyFlorida.com

Florida Department of Education

DOE Home

No Child Left Behind

 

 No Child Left Behind 

Text Index Google Custom Search


Select a Topic of Interest:

No Child Left Behind Monitoring

Monitoring No Child Left Behind (NCLB) programs supports the Florida Department of Education’s (FLDOE’s) mission to increase the proficiency of all students within one seamless, efficient system.  It allows the FLDOE to examine the implementation of these federally funded programs designed to increase student proficiency. Through regular monitoring, the FLDOE can identify implementation issues specific to the Local Educational Agencies (LEAs) or pervasive statewide, and provide technical assistance that is tailored to institute enduring system improvements. Thus, monitoring serves not only as a means for helping LEAs achieve high quality implementation of educational programs; it also helps the FLDOE collaborate more effectively with LEAs for systemic and systematic program improvement.

Education Department General Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) at 34 CFR 80.40(a) requires the FLDOE to monitor subgrant activities “to assure compliance with applicable Federal requirements and that performance goals are being achieved.”  Section 1008.32, Florida Statutes, addresses the responsibility of the State Board of Education for oversight and enforcement relative to compliance.

The FLDOE utilizes a focused monitoring process to meet these state and federal requirements and to ensure that federal programs are implemented with fidelity. It is important to note that the FLDOE reserves the right to withhold funding to, and to implement other more restrictive conditions for subgrant recipients deemed as not implementing state and federal programs with fidelity, as determined through the monitoring process.

Following the monitoring process, the FLDOE utilizes a report to identify areas where an LEA might be fully compliant, if further action is required, or, in some cases, not applicable. The Criterion section identifies specific activities required for full compliance. For items that require further action, a General Findings Statement describes non-compliance. Specific information about what is required for an LEA to be compliant is found in the Specific Findings section of the report. This information is released in a preliminary report, which should be carefully reviewed. Following the receipt of the preliminary report, the LEA must submit System Improvement Plan(s). Information in the Specific Findings section is used as a guide for actions that must be addressed and included in System Improvement Plans. If the LEA determines that the FLDOE has made an error in the findings, the LEA may submit a request for reconsideration. Following the approval of all System Improvement Plans and, if applicable, requests for reconsideration, the FLDOE issues a final report.

All LEAs/State Agencies must submit approved Self-Evaluation Certifications and System Improvement Plans electronically to

ANNOUNCEMENT!

In response to requests from LEAs, we have been able to re-adjust the schedule and due dates for the 2008-09 NCLB monitoring cycle.  The changes are as follows:
  • The on-site monitoring visits will occur as originally scheduled.  The due date for documentation is now 10/17/08 rather than 9/29/08.
  • Desktop monitoring activities will take place the week of January 12, 2009, for Citrus, Lafayette, Pasco, and Dixie, and the week of January 19, 2009, for Alachua, Hernando, Holmes, and P.K. Yonge (UF lab school).  All documentation is now due 11/14/08, rather than 9/28/08.
  • Self-monitored LEAs now have a deadline of 10/31 for submitting the Self-Evaluation Certification, rather than the original due date of 9/29.

Important Tools

LEAs Designated for Onsite and Desktop Monitoring

The Word version of the work papers found below are tools to assess compliance during the monitoring process. Please answer each question for all required programs and send responses to the
program person(s)
assigned to the LEA. Once questions have been submitted, please submit the online monitoring work papers and upload documentation. Users may submit system improvement plans at this time or after receipt of the preliminary monitoring report, depending on the program being monitored.

LEAs Completing Self Monitoring

The Word version of the work papers found below are tools to assess compliance during the monitoring process. Please answer each question for all required programs and collect documentation to be maintained with the LEA should it need to be reviewed by FLDOE or U.S. Department of Education (USED). Submit appropriate system improvement plans to for each title grant.

2008-2009 Title Grant Work Papers (Word Documents)

Questions concerning the monitoring process may be directed to or by
phone: (850) 245-0509. Please direct all program specific questions/concerns to program staff.

Five Year Monitoring Schedule for 2007-2011
Key: D = Desktop Monitoring and OS = Onsite Monitoring

2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012
Wakulla UF Lab School (D) Bay Escambia Columbia
Hillsborough Miami-Dade (OS) Gadsden Santa Rosa Baker
Pinellas Pasco (D) Putnam Nassau Lake
Gilchrist Union (OS) Jefferson Duval Orange
Charlotte Bradford (OS) Hamilton Volusia Sarasota
Liberty Holmes (D) Manatee Seminole DeSoto
Franklin Calhoun (OS) Hardee Martin St. Johns
FAU Lab School Citrus (D) Highlands St. Lucie FSDB
Levy Hernando (D) Polk Palm Beach FSU Lab School
Marion Monroe (OS) Gulf Osceola FAMU Lab School
Clay Collier (OS) Jackson Okeechobee Broward
Indian River Lee (OS) Taylor Madison Glades
Flager Alachua (D) Brevard Suwannee DOC
Lafayette (D) Leon Dozier Okaloosa
Dixie (D) Dozier II Walton
Sumter (OS) Okeechobee/Dozier Hendry
Washington