Printer FriendlyBureau of Educator Recruitment, Development and Retention
Bureau of Educator Recruitment, Development and Retention |
| Text Index |
Custom Search
|
NCLB: 2005-2006 Competitive Proposal Submission Summary & Funding Projections (EETT Part II)*
| District | Category | Number of 2005 Competitive NCLB:EETT Part II Proposals Submitted | Total Funding Request (Includes All 2005 NCLB:EETT Part II Proposals Submitted for Evaluation) | Number of 2005 NCLB:EETT Part II Proposals Recommended for Award | Projected 2005-06 EETT Part II Funding (Based on Results of Competition) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alachua | High-Need | 1 | $1,250,000.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Baker | Partnership | 0 | $0.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Bay | High-Need | 1 | $1,248,939.56 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Bradford | High-Need | 1 | $1,200,000.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Brevard | High-Need | 1 | $1,250,000.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Broward | High-Need | 1 | $1,200,000.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Calhoun | High-Need | 1 | $879,033.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Charlotte | High-Need | 0 | $0.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Citrus | High-Need | 0 | $0.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Clay | High-Need | 0 | $0.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Collier | High-Need | 1 | $1,085,077.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Columbia | High-Need | 1 | $1,007,590.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Miami-Dade | High-Need | 1 | $1,250,000.00 | 1 | $1,012,722.96 |
| DeSoto | High-Need | 1 | $1,310,167.64 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Dixie | High-Need | 0 | $0.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Duval | High-Need | 1 | $1,099,526.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Escambia | High-Need | 1 | $1,244,068.28 | 1 | $1,012,722.96 |
| Flagler | Partnership | 0 | $0.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Franklin | High-Need | 0 | $0.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Gadsden | High-Need | 1 | $1,017,120.00 |
1 | $911,450.66 |
| Gilchrist | High-Need | 1 | $1,237,393.19 |
0 | $0.00 |
| Glades | High-Need | 0 | $0.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Gulf | High-Need | 1 | $909,569.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Hamilton | High-Need | 0 | $0.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Hardee | High-Need | 0 | $0.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Hendry | High-Need | 1 | $1,085,290.53 | 1 | $860,814.52 |
| Hernando | High-Need | 1 | $965,000.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Highlands | High-Need | 1 | $1,250,000.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Hillsborough | High-Need | 1 | $1,250,000.00 | 1 | $1,012,722.96 |
| Holmes | High-Need | 1 | $800,000.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Indian River | Partnership | 0 | $0.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Jackson | High-Need | 1 | $1,250,000.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Jefferson | High-Need | 0 | $0.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Lafayette | High-Need | 0 | $0.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Lake | High-Need | 1 | $1,250,000.00 | 1 | $1,164,631.40 |
| Lee | High-Need | 0 | $0.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Leon | High-Need | 1 | $1,249,246.77 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Levy | High-Need | 1 | $1,144,902.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Liberty | High-Need | 1 | $800,459.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Madison | High-Need | 1 | $924,224.00 | 1 | $886,133.44 |
| Manatee | High-Need | 1 | $1,249,781.25 | 1 | $1,012,722.96 |
| Marion | High-Need | 1 | $1,080,070.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Martin | Partnership | 0 | $0.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Monroe | Partnership | 0 | $0.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Nassau | Partnership | 0 | $0.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Okaloosa | High-Need | 0 | $0.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Okeechobee | High-Need | 1 | $800,000.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Orange | High-Need | 1 | $944,046.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Osceola | High-Need | 1 | $1,250,000.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Palm Beach | High-Need | 1 | $1,250,000.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Pasco | High-Need | 0 | $0.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Pinellas | High-Need | 1 | $1,245,895.00 | 1 | $1,012,722.96 |
| Polk | High-Need | 1 | $1,013,835.28 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Putnam | High-Need | 1 | $986,963.50 | 0 | $0.00 |
| St. Johns | High-Need | 1 | $1,224,926.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| St. Lucie | Partnership | 0 | $0.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Santa Rosa | Partnership | 0 | $0.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Sarasota | Partnership | 0 | $0.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Seminole | High-Need | 1 | $1,106,678.00 | 1 | $987,404.89 |
| Sumter | High-Need | 1 | $887,574.84 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Suwannee | High-Need | 1 | $1,250,000.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Taylor | High-Need | 1 | $1,250,000.00 | 1 | $962,086.81 |
| Union | High-Need | 1 | $1,179,031.40 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Volusia | High-Need | 2 | $1,310,355.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Wakulla | Partnership | 0 | $0.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Walton | High-Need | 0 | $0.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Washington | High-Need | 0 | $0.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| FSDB | High-Need | 0 | $0.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| P.K. Yonge D.R.S. | High-Need | 0 | $0.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| A.D. Henderson D.R.S. | High-Need | 0 | $0.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| FSU D.R.S. | High-Need | 0 | $0.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| FAMU D.R.S. | High-Need | 0 | $0.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| TOTAL | N/A | 43 | $47,186,762.24 | 11 | $10,836,136.52 |
* Formal project award notices (DOE200 Forms) are issued upon completion of the internal application technical review process. Award projection information has been posted to assist districts with their internal planning work. Official project award notices are forwarded directly to district superintendents following formal signature approval. The formal award notification process will be completed as expeditiously as possible to facilitate implementation of new projects. Proposals recommended for funding have been recommended at levels different from original requests. Successful budget negotiations will be required in order to address specific EETT project evaluation needs as well as certain other cost reductions identified by evaluators through a consensus budget review process.
Bureau of Instruction and Innovation staff are looking forward to implementation of 2005-06 competitive EETT projects. All 2005-06 projects will involve teacher participation in formal Digital Learning Institutes to be conducted in the summer period.
The 2005-06 EETT proposal competition involved 43 applications and a total funding request of $47,186,762.24. With $10,836,136.52 available to allocate under the competitive portion of the program, it is certainly not possible to fund every worthy proposal. A formal proposal evaluation process was used to select proposals which seem to have the greatest chance of success. The proposal scoring process was based on evaluation criteria prescribed in the 2005-06 EETT Competitive Application/RFP. The selection process involved a total of seventeen educators (representing Florida, Illinois, Michigan, North Carolina, and Tennessee) who have considerable expertise in instructional technology. Eleven projects have been recommended for funding (4 larger sized districts, 3 medium sized districts, and 4 smaller sized districts). For districts that did not compete this year or are not slated to receive 2005-06 competitive funds, it is our hope that a future EETT proposal competition can provide opportunities to meet critical local technology resource and/or training needs. Evaluators contributed considerable expertise and energy to the challenging task of identifying proposals for funding, and their involvement was essential to a successful proposal competition. Information provided in this chart is preliminary planning data only and does not represent a funding commitment by the Florida Department of Education. Failure to address one or more NCLB:EETT program participation requirements, application documentation deficiencies, unsuccessful proposal budget negotiations, or lack of an acceptable district technology plan can delay (or prevent) issuance of an official EETT project award notice. Continued participation in the NCLB:EETT program requires that districts make a concerted effort to meet their obligations as outlined in EETT project applications, on DOE200 Project Award Notices, and within the Federal NCLB:EETT legislation. District EETT project coordinators should review prior year EETT project records to make sure that required project progress and evaluation reports have been submitted. Specific guidance concerning preparation and submission of project reports can be found on the FLDOE EETT program website.
Competitive proposal evaluation materials (scores and comments) will be provided to all applicants as soon as practical. It is anticipated that proposal evaluation feedback can be disseminated prior to the end of April, 2006. It will not be necessary for district personnel to submit a special request to receive proposal evaluation material. This information will be forwarded to the official application contact (identified on the DOE100A EETT Part II application cover sheet). The information will be sent through e-mail (if an e-mail address has been provided). Otherwise, it will be sent via FAX or regular mail.