Printer FriendlyBureau of Educator Recruitment, Development and Retention
Bureau of Educator Recruitment, Development and Retention |
| Text Index |
Custom Search
|
NCLB: 2003-2004 Competitive Proposal Submission Summary & Funding Projections (EETT Part II)*
| District | Category | Number of 2003 Competitive NCLB:EETT Part II Proposals Submitted | Total Funding Request (Includes All 2003 NCLB:EETT Part II Proposals Submitted for Evaluation) | Number of 2003 NCLB:EETT Part II Proposals Recommended for Award | Projected 2003-04 EETT Part II Funding (Based on Results of Competition) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alachua | High-Need | 1 | $172,500.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Baker | Partnership | 0 | $0.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Bay | High-Need | 2 | $495,441.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Bradford | High-Need | 2 | $597,627.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Brevard | High-Need | 1 | $300,000.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Broward | High-Need | 3 | $701,322.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Calhoun | High-Need | 2 | $600,000.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Charlotte | High-Need | 0 | $0.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Citrus | High-Need | 1 | $244,852.00 | 1 | $244,852.00 |
| Clay | High-Need | 3 | $707,800.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Collier | High-Need | 3 | $700,000.00 | 1 | $250,000.00 |
| Columbia | High-Need | 2 | $600,000.00 | 2 | $600,000.00 |
| Miami-Dade | High-Need | 1 | $300,000.00 | 1 | $300,000.00 |
| DeSoto | High-Need | 4 | $1,000,000.00 | 1 | $300,000.00 |
| Dixie | High-Need | 0 | $0.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Duval | High-Need | 3 | $831,838.00 | 1 | $150,000.00 |
| Escambia | High-Need | 2 | $596,106.00 | 2 | $596,106.00 |
| Flagler | Partnership | 0 | $0.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Franklin | High-Need | 3 | $699,500.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Gadsden | High-Need | 2 | $600,000.00 | 2 | $600,000.00 |
| Gilchrist | High-Need | 0 | $0.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Glades | High-Need | 1 | $299,894.00 | 1 | $299,894.00 |
| Gulf | High-Need | 3 | $750,000.00 | 2 | $600,000.00 |
| Hamilton | High-Need | 1 | $300,000.00 | 1 | $300,000.00 |
| Hardee | High-Need | 0 | $0.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Hendry | High-Need | 3 | $700,000.00 | 1 | $300,000.00 |
| Hernando | High-Need | 3 | $700,000.00 | 3 | $700,000.00 |
| Highlands | High-Need | 2 | $600,000.00 | 1 | $300,000.00 |
| Hillsborough | High-Need | 2 | $600,000.00 | 2 | $600,000.00 |
| Holmes | High-Need | 2 | $600,000.00 | 2 | $600,000.00 |
| Indian River | Partnership | 0 | $0.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Jackson | High-Need | 2 | $600,000.00 | 1 | $300,000.00 |
| Jefferson | High-Need | 2 | $599,736.61 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Lafayette | High-Need | 1 | $299,980.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Lake | High-Need | 3 | $699,726.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Lee | High-Need | 0 | $0.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Leon | High-Need | 2 | $987,000.00 | 2 | $1,052,444.32 |
| Levy | High-Need | 0 | $0.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Liberty | High-Need | 4 | $745,285.90 | 2 | $349,703.90 |
| Madison | High-Need | 2 | $497,132.08 | 2 | $298,846.08 |
| Manatee | High-Need | 2 | $598,875.00 | 1 | $299,087.50 |
| Marion | High-Need | 3 | $900,000.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Martin | Partnership | 0 | $0.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Monroe | Partnership | 0 | $0.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Nassau | Partnership | 0 | $0.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Okaloosa | High-Need | 0 | $0.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Okeechobee | High-Need | 3 | $900,000.00 | 1 | $300,000.00 |
| Orange | High-Need | 2 | $533,843.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Osceola | High-Need | 2 | $600,000.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Palm Beach | High-Need | 3 | $894,477.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Pasco | High-Need | 0 | $0.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Pinellas | High-Need | 2 | $600,000.00 | 1 | $300,000.00 |
| Polk | High-Need | 4 | $1,000,000.00 | 1 | $300,000.00 |
| Putnam | High-Need | 1 | $205,878.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| St. Johns | High-Need | 1 | $300,000.00 | 1 | $300,000.00 |
| St. Lucie | Partnership | 2 | $638,132.00 | 1 | $300,000.00 |
| Santa Rosa | Partnership | 3 | $975,134.00 | 3 | $850,000.00 |
| Sarasota | Partnership | 1 | $552,500.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Seminole | High-Need | 1 | $293,823.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Sumter | High-Need | 0 | $0.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Suwannee | High-Need | 1 | $300,000.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Taylor | High-Need | 3 | $600,000.00 | 2 | $300,000.00 |
| Union | High-Need | 2 | $597,514.02 | 1 | $100,000.00 |
| Volusia | High-Need | 3 | $685,100.00 | 1 | $300,000.00 |
| Wakulla | Partnership | 0 | $0.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| Walton | High-Need | 2 | $600,000.00 | 2 | $600,000.00 |
| Washington | High-Need | 2 | $599,675.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| FSDB | High-Need | 1 | $300,000.00 | 1 | $300,000.00 |
| P.K. Yonge D.R.S. | High-Need | 1 | $299,580.00 | 1 | $299,580.00 |
| A.D. Henderson D.R.S. | High-Need | 0 | $0.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
| FSU D.R.S. | High-Need | 2 | $596,616.00 | 1 | $299,345.00 |
| FAMU D.R.S. | High-Need | 2 | $600,000.00 | 1 | $300,000.00 |
| TOTAL | N/A | 117 | $32,296,887.61 | 50 | $13,889,858.80 |
* Formal project award notices (DOE200 Forms) are issued upon completion of the internal application technical review process. Award projection information has been posted to assist districts with their internal planning work. Official award notices are forwarded directly to district superintendents following formal signature approval. Office of Educational Technology staff feel very positive about the potential impact of the projects that can be supported this year. The 2003-04 EETT proposal competition involved some 117 applications and a total funding request of $32,296,887.61. With $13,889,858.80 available to allocate under the competitive portion of the program, it is certainly not possible to fund every worthy proposal. A formal proposal evaluation process (involving over 30 educators from around Florida who have considerable expertise in educational technology) is used to identify proposals that seem to have the greatest chance of success. The proposal scoring process is based on evaluation criteria described in the 03-04 EETT Competitive Application/RFP. For districts that did not compete this year or are not slated to receive 2003-04 competitive funds, it is our hope that future EETT proposal competitions can provide opportunities to meet critical local technology resource and/or training needs.
Information provided in this chart is preliminary planning data only and does not represent a funding commitment by the Florida Department of Education. Failure to address one or more NCLB:EETT program participation requirements, application documentation deficiencies, unsuccessful proposal budget negotiations, or lack of an acceptable district technology plan can delay (or prevent) issuance of an official EETT project award notice. Continued participation in the NCLB:EETT program requires that districts make a concerted effort to meet their obligations as outlined in EETT project applications, on DOE200 Project Award Notices, and within the Federal NCLB:EETT legislation. District EETT project coordinators should review prior year EETT project records to make sure that required interim project progress reports have been submitted. Specific guidance concerning preparation and submission of project progress reports can be found on the Office of Educational Technology EETT website.
In a few instances, this table will not provide sufficient information to determine exactly which proposal(s) has (have) been recommended for funding. Clarification will be provided to official district application contacts via telephone and/or e-mail in those instances. Some proposals recommended for funding have been recommended at a level different from the original request. Successful budget negotiations will be required in order to meet specific needs of the Department (as well as certain technology resource and training needs identified by the applicant). Proposal abstracts are under development at this time and will be linked to this table as soon as practical.
Competitive proposal evaluation materials (scores & comments) will be provided to all applicants as soon as practical. It is anticipated that proposal evaluation feedback can be disseminated prior to the end of February, 2004. It will not be necessary for district personnel to submit a special request to receive proposal evaluation material. This information will be forwarded to the official application contact (identified on the DOE100A EETT Part II application cover sheet). The information will be sent through e-mail (if an e-mail address has been provided). Otherwise, it will sent via FAX or regular mail.
A special thanks to all participants in the 03-04 EETT competition and to those who assisted the Office of Educational Technology in evaluating proposals that were submitted!